Despite Supreme Court Ruling, States Are Still Confiscating People’s Homes Authored by Michael Clements via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours), Horses taught Christine Searle the importance of being fair. Intelligent and innately honest creatures, horses know deceit when they see it. She wishes they could teach that principle to the state of Arizona. (Illustration by The Epoch Times, Shutterstock) The 70-year-old horse trainer and Arizona native is on the verge of losing her life’s...
The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) on Tuesday admitted the appeal filed by the United Right Alliance (USR, PMP, Forța Dreptei) against the decision of the Central Electoral Bureau to reject its founding protocol. Thus, USR, Forța Dreptei and PMP can participate in the elections together. The ruling of the High Court is […]
It has been stayed till the Bombay High Court’s final order on the pleas challenging the validity of amendments to the 2023 Information Technology Rules.
The federal government has struggled to update Canadian privacy laws over the past decade, leaving the Supreme Court as perhaps the leading source of privacy protection. In 2014, the court issued the Spencer decision, which affirmed a reasonable expectation of privacy in basic subscriber information and earlier this month it released the Bykovets decision, which extends the reasonable expectation of privacy to IP addresses. Vibert Jack is the litigation director of the BC Civil Liberties...
Ex-Man City forward Robinho was found guilty of gang rape in Italy back in 2017. Italian prosecutors had demanded that he be extradited to serve his sentence. The Premier League has to wake up! More than 5 minutes for a VAR check.. what about the paying customers in the stadium? -
The court ordered this transfer of cases based on a transfer petition by the Indian government, urging a consolidation of all the cases against the IT Rules, 2021 to one high court to avoid divergence of opinions.
The court said that it cannot bypass the statutory procedure just because the accused is a politician.
The Supreme Court heard arguments challenging access to the abortion pill Mifepristone. Rachel Maddow joins Joy Reid to discuss.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in a case that has everything to do with abortion and, at the same time, nothing to do with abortion. The court will decide whether the Federal Drug Administration acted properly in 2016 and 2021 when it made it easier for women to obtain mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in medication abortions in this country. At the same time, this case has nothing to do with abortion. It’s about whether the FDA, a federal executive agency, acted...
Abortion access returns to the high court, nearly two years after the Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade. This time access to the abortion pill mifepristone hangs in the balance.
Nearly two years after a momentous ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court helped restrict abortion access, the top court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a case involving access to the abortion medication mifepristone. Tens of thousands currently get the pills by mail in order to terminate a pregnancy.
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the parents of a teenage boy who were stripped of custody rights by the state of Indiana for not affirming their son's self-proclaimed "gender identity” as a girl.