The justices of the Supreme Court never focused on the First Amendment’s words when hearing arguments in Murthy v. Missouri last week. The case challenges the federal government’s orchestration of social media censorship, so one might have expected the justices to pay some attention to the First Amendment itself. Instead, the court relied on its […]
The Supreme Court heard arguments challenging access to the abortion pill Mifepristone. Rachel Maddow joins Joy Reid to discuss.
Labor is grappling with another High Court challenge as an Iranian citizen known as ASF17 makes a legal bid for freedom from Australia's immigration detention.
In the name of “saving democracy,” a former presidential aide is now in a federal prison in Miami.
Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer talks with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer about the decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade and how he thinks this move could have affected the future of the court.
Fears have been expressed that the unit would supress free speech and the freedom of the press.
Even though the Supreme Court outlawed race-based education programs last year, Congress is still funding glaring loopholes based.
It is obviously un-American for the government to develop a 'hit list' of citizens to mute in the public square through secret pressure on communications monopolies.
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Tuesday that a man’s challenge to his former placement on the No Fly List can move forward, finding the government failed to show his lawsuit is moot. Yonas Fikr
Everything important passed by the Legislature came after court gained a liberal majority.
A historic decision on Amazon driver classification has been handed down in Wisconsin. The Associated Press reports: “The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday let stand a lower court ruling that declared some delivery drivers for Amazon were employees as the state argued, not independent contractors as the online retail giant contended. The court, in a unanimous decision,… Source
Do government officials violate the 1st Amendment when they press internet platforms to remove or restrict misinformation about COVID-19, alleged election fraud or other matters of public interest? That proposition was presented to the Supreme Court on Monday, and many justices seemed appropriately skeptical. In one of several internet-related cases considered by the court this term, a lawyer for Louisiana and Missouri and some individuals defended an injunction saying that federal officials,...