Court should not grant Trump any broad-scale ‘immunity’
by Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner— Several Supreme Court justices yesterday seemed disturbingly open to far too wide a scope of supposed presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. Almost nothing in the actual text of the Constitution provides for such immunity. At oral argument in Trump v. United States, Justice Clarence Thomas asked the right question of Trump’s attorney, John Sauer: “Could […]
The Washington Times—Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, says court will grant Donald Trump some level of immunity. Sen. Lindsey Graham says he thinks the Supreme Court will send former President Donald Trump’s election interference case back to the lower courts to decide which of his actions qualify for presidential immunity.
The Guardian—US supreme court eyes returning Trump immunity claim to lower court after arguments. Justices appeared unlikely to grant request for absolute immunity from criminal prosecution to former presidentKey takeaways from Trump immunity caseSign up for our free Trump on Trial newsletterThe US supreme court on Thursday expressed interest in returning Donald Trump’s criminal case over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election back to a lower court to decide whether certain parts of the indictment were “official acts” that were protected by presidential immunity.During oral arguments, the...
TheBlaze—Supreme Court hears Trump's immunity claim. On Thursday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments on whether Donald Trump is immune from prosecution in the alleged election interference case, which was put on hold in February.Thursday morning, Trump told reporters, "A president has to have immunity," the Associated Press reported."If you don't have immunity, you just have a ceremonial president," he added.The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and consider "whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy...