Pirates Of The Caribbean 6 is a go, but it’s still a no-go for Johnny Depp’s return. Fans of the … Why ‘Pirates Of The Caribbean 6’ Is Happening Without Johnny Depp was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.
The attorney for a man who fatally stabbed his mother when he was 13 years old defended his client Friday after Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer’s office issued a warning to the public that the man walked away from a halfway house and was at-large. Ike Souzer — who had already escaped from custody […]
The case is expected to remain on hold for at least five more months while he continues psychiatric treatment.
As fans eagerly await the next part of the beloved Disney adventure franchise, producer Jerry Bruckheimer has dropped a major hint, suggesting that the next installment of Pirates of the Caribbean will be a reboot, instead of a straight sequel. Bruckheimer is known for producing each of the five Pirates movies that featured Johnny Depp in the iconic role of Captain Jack Sparrow. While fans were anticipating Depp’s return for the next film, Bruckheimer’s recent statement also suggests that the...
Johnny Depp's future with the "Pirates" franchise is uncertain.
Criminal Minds alum Lola Glaudini shared a new story about Johnny Depp from the set of the 2001 film Blow on an episode of the Powerful Truth Angels podcast in January. In a clip resurfaced on Twitter, Glaudini recalled a “fucked up” situation that she had never shared publicly before, involving Depp shouting at her in front of the entire cast and crew while shooting. The actor says the experience was brought back to her mind while watching news footage of the Depp/Amber Heard trial. “I show...
Actress Lola Glaudini claims Johnny Depp 'railed at' her on the set of 'Blow': "The only thing going through my head was, ‘Don’t cry, don’t cry, don’t cry.’"
Federal court rules firearm restrictions on defendants awaiting trial are constitutional
Court orders that prohibited two criminal defendants from possessing firearms while they awaited trial were constitutional because they were in line with past restrictions on firearms
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Court orders that prohibited two criminal defendants from possessing firearms while they awaited trial were constitutional because they were in line with past restrictions on firearms, a federal court ruled Monday. Judge Gabriel P. Sanchez, writing for a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, found that
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Court orders that prohibited two criminal defendants from possessing firearms while they awaited trial were constitutional because they were in line with past restrictions on firearms. That’s according to a unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The judges found that U.S. laws have
Court orders that barred two criminal defendants from possessing guns while they awaited trial were in line with historical restrictions on firearms and therefore constitutional, a federal court ruled Monday. While specific to the two cases in question, the court's analysis adds to one of the most contentious debates in modern constitutional law: the scope of the 2nd Amendment's protections when it comes to accused criminals. Judge Gabriel P. Sanchez, writing for a unanimous three-judge panel of...